Perfect for Your Purpose Now

Matisse 1912

Matisse 1912

Imagine you are a work of art. Lovingly imagined and painstakingly worked on by your creator.

The canvas is stretched and attached to a sturdy frame. A blank slate, free from plans and expectations, with the ability to become anything.

Perfect for its Purpose Now

Rembrandt 1628

Rembrandt 1628

The gesso is prepared and painted onto the canvas laying a foundation to keep the delicious colors coming later from being absorbed into the canvas and becoming muted.

Perfect for its Purpose Now

Everyday brush strokes are added. Forms take shape. Sometimes the colors or the brush strokes don’t come out the way that the creator imagined. New ideas spring up from these unexpected outcomes.

Perfect for its Purpose Now

Matisse 1955

Matisse 1955

This work of art needs to be shared. It is different than what was originally imagined. It is beautifully unique and evokes exquisite emotions. Keeping it in storage simply because it doesn’t match the original plan is selfish.

Perfect for its Purpose Now

Just as you wouldn’t compare a Matisse to a Rembrandt (or a Jade Katt) and you wouldn’t compare two works of arts created by the same artist if there is a 30 year gap between the works, this work of art shall not be compared to others because it is Perfect for its Purpose Now

Rembrandt 1658

Rembrandt 1658

Your Messaging is Transparent – What About Your Listening?

One of my coaching clients, Phillip, mentioned an interesting communication challenge within his team. He has an energetic and intellectually brilliant team member, Brenda, with an abrasive and off-putting communication style. Phillip is working with Brenda on overcoming this challenge, but in the meantime her teammate Jeff can’t separate the message from the messenger and opportunities to learn or improve processes are being lost.

We all have biases that affect what we perceive and how we interact. These biases are like lens filters. Sometimes they make things brighter and more noticeable, as in a shared background or experience making an interview candidate appear more favorable. In Jeff’s case, they make things muddy and more distant.

Upbringing, experiences, opinions of influencers in our lives and the current situation affect which personal filters we put up at any one time. These filters have a valid purpose—to keep us safe. We can quickly decide who is friend or foe and protect our inner self, but that safety comes at the expense of unexplored possibilities.

Listening transparently is not easy. It requires:

  • Self-Awareness: Understanding and acceptance of your personal biases and communication style. If you can’t identify the filter, you can’t put it away.
  • Confidence: Strong belief in yourself, so that other’s opinions and ideas don’t threaten you.
  • Courage: Fearlessness to open yourself up to something you may not want to hear.
  • Suspended Judgment: Separating the content of the message from the delivery.
  • Practice: Frequent repetition and reminders to improve the quality of your listening skills.

I am a problem solver by nature. When team members approached me with ideas, I used to start spouting off obstacles that would need to be overcome. I’m sure I annoyed and intimidated more than one colleague.

A few years back, I started consciously practicing openness in my listening habits. Even though it took time for my team to catch on, the results were outstanding. The team became more energized and the level of innovation increased considerably.

Start practicing transparent listening. Drop those filters and grab those opportunities.You owe it to yourself.

My Apologies to the First Team I Supervised

Last weekend friends and I went to a restaurant and our conversation was interrupted by a child.  You’ve seen it yourself; sweaty, scrunched up face; flailing  legs and arms and screeching that digs down just like a dentist’s drill.  We commiserated with the harried parent who was probably wishing their kid had come with an owner’s manual since the mix of cajoling, yelling and bribery weren’t working out.

In the same manner that parents raise their children without benefit of formal training, many newly minted managers are given a pat on the back, attaboy (or attagirl) as a hearty congratulations and left to navigate the complexities of engaging, developing and maximizing the productivity of a diverse group of people all on their own.

The results are predictably mixed. Some are fortunate enough to have had role models they can draw from and sufficient self-awareness to know that leading teams is a skill that needs thoughtful practice. Some, however, are driven by arrogance or by fear to induce employees to produce the bare minimum required to stay employed while they set all LinkedIn, Glassdoor and Indeed alerts in the hopes of finding a manager that will motivate, inspire and value their contributions.

However, training, coaching and mentoring managers isn’t the first step in moving towards an engaged workforce. The first step is ensuring that managers selected have an attitude that supports engagement. Attitude is inherent; it can’t be taught. Supervisors must genuinely care about the people on their team and the outcomes they produce, not just about their own interests and advancement.

Here is where the apology comes in. No matter how well intentioned, without proper training, coaching and mentoring, that first team will pay the price of your ignorance because managing becomes a matter of trial and error. To that first team, I should have:

  • Painted an ambitious and inspiring picture of what we could accomplish together
  • Been clear and explicit in my expectations of you
  • Asked incessantly what your dreams and aspirations were and how I could help you get there
  • Helped you identify your strengths and how to leverage them
  • Communicated tirelessly and transparently especially before, during and after a change
  • Backed you up in front of the rest of the organization no matter what discussions we had behind closed doors

According to Gallup, managers account for at least 70% of the variance in employee engagement scores. With employee engagement linked to customer satisfaction, productivity and profitability, doesn’t it make sense to create thoughtful and integrated initiatives to select and develop managers that won’t have to apologize?